Home
Casting Call List
Create Casting Call
Your Casting Calls
Casting Call Notifications
Casting calls

Model Release Form

You need to be logged on to use this facility
This thread is being watched by 1 person
Friday, November 06, 2009 8:12 PM
Natasha Bradley is off-line
nashnash
Model
nashnash
Location
United Kingdom
Merseyside
Liverpool

Hiya
Could anyone give me some more information about model release forms? I have a general idea what they are, but should I expect to sign them at TFP shoots without it being discussed previously? What about paid shoots?
 
Thanks for the help! x
Hard working, agency represented and professional model/internet addict.
Friday, November 06, 2009 9:06 PM
w4pictures is off-line
w4pictures
Photographer
w4pictures
Location
United Kingdom
London


Yes, would be my answer. I won't generally pick up a camera without a signed release, whether I've talked about it before or not.

From the model's POV, it makes hardly any difference on a paid, part paid or TF shoot.

If you are paying for the shoot, however, that's another matter.
Friday, November 06, 2009 9:30 PM
Adrian Curtis is off-line
Adrian_Curtis
Photographer

Location
United Kingdom
Northamptonshire


Copyright [ in the UK ] automatically belongs to the photographer or [ possibly ] their client, and it is up to them how the images are used. A signed model release is just evidence that the model understands this, and makes no difference to their rights or the shoot, whether it is paid, part paid, or tfp/cd. If the model hires the photographer, the model is the client, and therefore owns the copyright, again whether it is paid, part paid, or tf*. Hope this helps to clear things up for you.




[ * Moderator edits plus incorrect sentence struck out by Moderator. ]
Friday, November 06, 2009 9:54 PM
MichaelM is off-line
MichaelM
Photographer
MichaelM
Location
Ireland
Cork
Bristol- Cork

Quote from Adrian_Curtis
Copyright automatically belongs to the photographer or their client, and it is up to them how the images are used. A signed model release is just evidence that the model understands this, and makes no difference to their rights or the shoot, whether it is paid, part paid, or tfp/cd. If the model hires the photographer, the model is the client, and therefore owns the copyright, again whether it is paid, part paid, or tf. Hope this helps to clear things up for you.




emoticon Wrong fella, suggest you try again.

Saturday, November 07, 2009 1:29 AM
phil rees photography is off-line
Phil Rees
Photographer

Location
United Kingdom
Clwyd
Wrexham

Or you could tell us what's wrong about it?

Saturday, November 07, 2009 3:10 AM
Phil H is off-line
Silver Memberph_oto
Photographer

Location
United Kingdom
South Yorkshire
Barnsley

As has been said before a thousand times. even if a model is paying for the shoot she/he does NOT automatically own copyright. The only way that can happen is if the photographer agrees to assign copyright for the shoot (A very unlikely event) i.e. A wedding photographer (normally) does not assign copyright to the party who pays him for the wedding shoot.
A model release in the UK is not a legal requirement at all and is there solely to allow the model to possibly put restrictions on where/how her images are used, without it the photographer can do as he pleases with the images. Model release and copyright are two totally unrelated issues.

Both of course can be adjusted by mutual agreement, preferably before a shoot and as a written/signed contract.
Saturday, November 07, 2009 6:43 AM
Adrian Curtis is off-line
Adrian_Curtis
Photographer

Location
United Kingdom
Northamptonshire


Copyright belongs to the author of the work. If the work is commissioned, this can be different to the creator (the photographer). Piece of advice to models, if you ask someone to take some shots for your portfolio and pay them to do so, ask them to sign a copyleft agreement (think of it as a reverse model release)to clear things up.
Also, copyright law does not exist solely in the UK, as the mods seem to think. It even covers work internationally, under The Berne Convention and Universal Copyright Convention. The UK version just gives additional protection, such as 70 years duration instead of the standard 25.
I did try to keep things simple in my original post.
Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:02 AM
Natasha Bradley is off-line
nashnash
Model
nashnash
Location
United Kingdom
Merseyside
Liverpool

Great help, thank you very much :)
Hard working, agency represented and professional model/internet addict.
Sunday, November 08, 2009 1:04 PM
Jonvelle is off-line
JeanFrancois_Jonvelle
Photographer
JeanFrancois_Jonvelle
Location
United Kingdom
East Sussex
Brighton

Quote from Adrian_Curtis
Piece of advice to models, if you ask someone to take some shots for your portfolio and pay them to do so, ask them to sign a copyleft agreement (think of it as a reverse model release)to clear things up.

The UK version just gives additional protection, such as 70 years duration instead of the standard 25. I did try to keep things simple in my original post.



Would have thought a usage agreement would have been preferable to a "copyleft" agreement.  Am seeing my brief on Tuesday so will ask her as haven't heard of this one.

In the USA, they usually do life of author plus 70 years rather than a "standard 25" years : US Government Body Copyright Office ...France has 70 years as well....

Are you referring to posthumous works when you quote 25 years? Which will confuse many....



Sunday, November 08, 2009 5:11 PM
Adrian Curtis is off-line
Adrian_Curtis
Photographer

Location
United Kingdom
Northamptonshire


A usage agreement and copyleft agreement are essentially 2 names for the same thing. It's a play on the word copyright.
Under the Berne Convention and Universal Copyright Convention, works in 1 country are also covered by copyright in another country for at least 25 years, providing both countries are party to the same convention. For example, the US was not included in the Berne Convention, so the Universal Copyright Convention came into being.
Some countries stuck to the minimum 25 years from origination of the work, others used their national laws to extend this. In the UK it used to be 25 years, but then it was extended to 70 years in 1988 copyright act.
It might be worth checking with your brief how long a photograph taken in the UK would be covered for in, for example, the US. Not sure whether it would be UK or US laws.

78 Users currently online   Blue=Models Orange=Photographers Red=Agencies Purple=MUA/Stylists Grey=Studios Green=Moderators
___Naomi___ angel_mel Animal bobbystix Bonno brownsuga69 CaraMascara carliemarie DianeD46 distortedorchid EmmaHeron fi_stevens Izzy85 Jenna7887 Kayleigh_Kisses laurabartlett lileviee lilmiznaughty Logan20 maria87 Martin_84 olaa penny_campbell princesskel_83 psstyourefabulous shayhendrix2 Tidal_Kitten X_heather_x xXjbXx xxxfayexxx
2RRF 63jian a_boix adamjt7 AJimagesuk albasys anaushahi andy187329 arterotica autoimagery beyond_the_light BillStirling bishbash89 blunder1983 bri_p Buzz carrera casell creamtop daveydude dogsamsm finesse fotografofe fragiled GlasgowPhotographer HandsworthPhotography hotstuff Ian_Wilson JayJaySeven2 LatexLaundry lloyddesign mattw morrelli69 nib1980 nimbus orca_photography pas69storm portraits35 redrom simpleharmonicmotion southernsnapper SteveMac stiffoak571 taff_photo tiamatvenger tomhl tonycsm yofoto